National Politics

First-of-Its-Kind Tech Research Suggests Policies Requiring Websites to Host Hate Speech May Harm Digital Economy

A recent study by the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) Research Center and NERA Economic Consulting has found that platforming hate speech could harm both the companies advertising alongside the content and the apps and websites hosting it.

"Must carry," policies are prevalent in states like Florida, which require digital services to host all legal user-generated content – including hate speech.  The notion could damage the digital economy, the association stated in a press release. The data shows that an average of 40% of respondents reported liking the social media service less after viewing simulated hate speech content, while 20% reported that the content made them like the advertiser less.

"The findings indicate that user attitudes toward both digital services and adjacent advertisers are harmed by simulated hate speech, and ad click-through and purchase intentionality decline as well," said CCIA Chief Economist & Director of the Research Center Trevor Wagener.

The report analyzed the results of the first two public-facing survey experiments evaluating the impact of harmful third-party content on user attitudes toward websites and online advertisers, the association said. Both survey experiments used simulated content in a mock social media feed with imitation advertisements to measure respondent attitudes toward websites, apps, and advertisers before and after viewing simulated hate speech.

"This research provides direct evidence of the significant harms to websites, apps, and advertisers presented by laws forcing digital services to host all legal user-generated content," said CCIA President Matt Schruers. "The findings prove that when the government infringes upon private companies’ First Amendment rights to decide what content is appropriate for their audiences, the entire digital economy suffers."

The issue begs a constitutional question as well.  “Digital services have a First Amendment right to refuse to host users that promote suicide and self-harm, or that peddle racism and hate, for example,” said CCIA President Matt Schruers. “This bill disagrees and would give foreign extremists trafficking in vicious propaganda a platform to spread lies that put Americans at risk. Leading technology providers don’t want that, and nor do Texans.”

James McCool

is based in Tallahassee and is currently a Senior at Florida State University, studying Political Science and Religion. With a deep interest in politics, Jim has been initiated into the Benjamin Franklin Society of Scholars, and has competed nationally in undergraduate Mock Trial, as well as started the Moot Court team at his former high school. When not writing or studying, Jim is usually hitting the gym, watching reruns of Frasier, or keeping tabs on the New England Patriots.

Recent Posts

National Trade Groups File Lawsuit Against Portion of SB 25, Citing Need to Protect the First Amendment Rights of Texans

Four national trade associations filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western…

9 hours ago

Ted Cruz, John Cornyn, Chip Roy Defend Ten Commandments Display in Public Schools

U.S. Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, and Representative…

13 hours ago

August Pfluger Moves to Shield States from Foreign Pollution Penalties

U.S. Congressman August Pfluger (R) is advancing new permitting reform legislation aimed at preventing states…

14 hours ago

Ken Paxton Secures $294 Million in Purdue Pharma Settlement

Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced that Texas played a key role in a multistate…

15 hours ago

Trump Endorses Incumbent John Carter Over Valentina Gomez in GOP Primary

President Donald Trump is weighing in on the upcoming 2026 races in Texas, and his…

16 hours ago

President Trump Endorses Trever Nehls for Troy Nehls' Seat

Earlier this year, Troy Nehls (R-TX) announced that he would not be running for re-election,…

19 hours ago