Featured

SCOTUS Strikes Down Biden-Harris Title IX Request

In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court has dealt a blow to the Biden-Harris Administration. The incumbent administration requested that SCOTUS partially lift two injunctions that barred the Education Department from enforcing most of its Title IX rule. The update to Title IX would have expanded the definition of sex discrimination and harassment to include sexual orientation and gender identity. With the vote, SCOTUS has struck down the Biden-Harris Title IX request.

News of the vote began to circulate in the evening.

Those who opposed the update argued that the request would allow biological men to compete in women's sports, but the Biden-Harris Administration countered by saying that it wouldn't be the case. The update took effect on August 1st, and it quickly led to more than two dozen Republican attorneys generals suing over the rule, arguing that it would conflict with some of their state laws that block transgender students from participating in women's sports.

In SCOTUS' ruling, they argued that the Biden-Harris Administration had "not provided this Court a sufficient basis to disturb the lower courts." Thus, SCOTUS found that the challenged gender identity and sex discrimination protections were "intertwined with and affect other provisions of the rule."

Texas Rep. Chip Roy (R) praised the decision, suggesting that the vote should've been "6-3". Conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch was the lone conservative dissenter.

The dissenters offered a nine-page opinion, and Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued in the opinion that there was no reason to block the whole policy because of the provisions that the lower courts found unlawful.

“By blocking the Government from enforcing scores of regulations that respondents never challenged and that bear no apparent relationship to respondents’ alleged injuries, the lower courts went beyond their authority to remedy the discrete harms alleged here,” she said. Justice Sotomayor also pointed out one provision the administration would not be able to implement nationally involves schools’ obligations to provide students with accommodations for breastfeeding.

The Education Department maintains that it still supports its rule.

A spokesperson for the Education Department said in a statement that “while we do not agree with this ruling, the Department stands by the final Title IX regulations released in April 2024, and we will continue to defend those rules in the expedited litigation in the lower courts."

Daniel Molina

Daniel Molina is a managing editor and legislative correspondent with a decade of experience covering the evolving political landscape of the American South and Southwest.

View Comments

Recent Posts

'TrumpCare' and commemorative plaques — how Democrats are pitching dealmaking with the president

By JONATHAN J. COOPER and LISA MASCARO Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — Abdul El-Sayed has…

18 hours ago

Beth Van Duyne Accuses Democrats of 'Punching' Voters in the Face Over Border Policy

WASHINGTON — U.S. Representative Beth Van Duyne (R) warned that a change in Texas leadership…

1 day ago

Beth Van Duyne Warns Democratic House Majority Could Hurt Texas Energy

U.S. Representative Beth Van Duyne (R) warned that a Democratic-controlled House could bring renewed pressure…

1 day ago

Democratic political group launches new push to shape AI agenda before 2028

By NICHOLAS RICCARDI Associated Press DENVER (AP) — A Democratic political organization is announcing a…

1 day ago

Gina Hinojosa Echoes Joaquin Castro’s Push to Close Dilley 'Trailer Prison’

Representative Joaquin Castro (D-TX) and Governor-elect Gina Hinojosa (D-TX) are calling for the closure of…

1 day ago

Blue Wave, Red Reality Check: Weber Says Texas Republicans Regrouping

Texas Republicans are regrouping. After last week’s elections, Republicans are developing a game plan for…

1 day ago