Featured

SCOTUS Strikes Down Biden-Harris Title IX Request

In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court has dealt a blow to the Biden-Harris Administration. The incumbent administration requested that SCOTUS partially lift two injunctions that barred the Education Department from enforcing most of its Title IX rule. The update to Title IX would have expanded the definition of sex discrimination and harassment to include sexual orientation and gender identity. With the vote, SCOTUS has struck down the Biden-Harris Title IX request.

News of the vote began to circulate in the evening.

Those who opposed the update argued that the request would allow biological men to compete in women's sports, but the Biden-Harris Administration countered by saying that it wouldn't be the case. The update took effect on August 1st, and it quickly led to more than two dozen Republican attorneys generals suing over the rule, arguing that it would conflict with some of their state laws that block transgender students from participating in women's sports.

In SCOTUS' ruling, they argued that the Biden-Harris Administration had "not provided this Court a sufficient basis to disturb the lower courts." Thus, SCOTUS found that the challenged gender identity and sex discrimination protections were "intertwined with and affect other provisions of the rule."

Texas Rep. Chip Roy (R) praised the decision, suggesting that the vote should've been "6-3". Conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch was the lone conservative dissenter.

The dissenters offered a nine-page opinion, and Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued in the opinion that there was no reason to block the whole policy because of the provisions that the lower courts found unlawful.

“By blocking the Government from enforcing scores of regulations that respondents never challenged and that bear no apparent relationship to respondents’ alleged injuries, the lower courts went beyond their authority to remedy the discrete harms alleged here,” she said. Justice Sotomayor also pointed out one provision the administration would not be able to implement nationally involves schools’ obligations to provide students with accommodations for breastfeeding.

The Education Department maintains that it still supports its rule.

A spokesperson for the Education Department said in a statement that “while we do not agree with this ruling, the Department stands by the final Title IX regulations released in April 2024, and we will continue to defend those rules in the expedited litigation in the lower courts."

Daniel Molina

Daniel Molina is an award-winning senior reporter based in Miami. He holds a bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Florida International University.

Recent Posts

Texas Workforce Housing Coalition Files Lawsuit Alleging HB21 is Unconstitutional

The Texas Workforce Housing Coalition (TWHC) and Post WB Apartments, LLC, have filed a lawsuit…

1 day ago

John Cornyn Introduces Bill to Lower Out-of-Pocket Drug Cost for Seniors

U.S. Senator John Cornyn has introduced the Share the Savings with Seniors Act, legislation aimed…

1 day ago

Monica De La Cruz Introduces Pay Our Border Patrol and Customs Agents Act

U.S. Representative Monica De La Cruz (R) has introduced the Pay Our Border Patrol and…

1 day ago

Charlie Kirk News Conference Announces 'We Got Him'

The suspect has been identified as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, and in a press conference, Utah…

1 day ago

Trump Announces Police Have Caught Charlie Kirk's Assassin

President Donald Trump has just announced live on Fox News that law enforcement has Charlie…

1 day ago

Ted Cruz Targets Islamist Violence with Nigeria Religious Freedom Act

U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R) has introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025,…

1 day ago