Featured

IRS Says Churches Can Endorse Candidates Without Losing Tax-Exemption

The IRS announced this week that churches endorsing political candidates during religious services should not risk losing their tax-exempt status. The controversial decision marks a significant shift in the interpretation of the Johnson Amendment.

The announcement came through a joint court filing between the IRS and the National Religious Broadcasters Association, an evangelical media consortium, to end ongoing litigation in Texas.

The plaintiffs had sued the IRS last August, claiming the Johnson Amendment violated their First Amendment rights to free speech and religious exercise.

The Johnson Amendment, named after then-Senator Lyndon B. Johnson (D), prohibits tax-exempt organizations, including churches, from endorsing or opposing political candidates. However, the new filing urges courts to interpret the amendment narrowly, stating it "does not reach communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services...on matters of faith."

The IRS has maintained a hands-off approach regarding the Johnson Amendment when it comes to political speech from religious institutions, but this week’s filing effectively puts that leniency into writing.

Nonprofit law experts told The New York Times, who first reported on the issue, that the move could open the door to more overt political advocacy in churches, a concern for those who view the amendment as a guardrail separating church and state.

The policy shift echoes President Donald Trump’s (R) 2017 executive order directing the Treasury Department not to enforce the Johnson Amendment. “I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment,” President Trump said at a National Prayer Breakfast in 2017.

While the ruling is expected to draw major backlash, Republicans are already coming out in support.

On social media, state Rep. Nate Schatzline (R) calling it was a “WIN for religious liberty,” writing, “the separation of Church and State was intended to keep the State out of the Church, it was NEVER intended to silence the Church from being civically engaged!”

Daniel Molina

Daniel Molina is a managing editor and legislative correspondent with a decade of experience covering the evolving political landscape of the American South and Southwest.

Recent Posts

Mystic Alerts Act Advances in Senate After Central Texas Floods

The bipartisan Mystic Alerts Act, led by Rep. August Pfluger (R), advanced through the Senate…

13 hours ago

House Passes Bill Combating Illicit Xylazine

Congressman August Pfluger's (R) bipartisan, bicameral Combating Illicit Xylazine Act passed the U.S. House unanimously,…

13 hours ago

Ted Cruz Hosts Roundtable Seeking to Push TREY'S Law to House

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R) hosted a roundtable Wednesday on the Terminating Restrictive Enforcement of…

13 hours ago

Apex and Meta Sign 144 MW Solar Agreement in Texas

Apex Clean Energy and Meta signed a power purchase agreement for environmental attributes from the…

13 hours ago

Trump’s $5,000 Promise Sparks Pushback From House Democrats

After last week’s Republican midterm convention, Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) had a few things to…

14 hours ago

Congress Passes Bill Protecting Ratepayers. Some Lawmakers Question If It’s Enough

Lawmakers are continuing to debate how to address constituents’ growing concerns over large-load data centers,…

15 hours ago