A recent editorial from The Dallas Morning News calls for aggressive action against two Dallas shingle factories, framing plant closures as the path to cleaner air in Joppa. However, in doing so, the article missed the mark, overlooking the primary pollution sources and promoting a costly political narrative far off from core environmental realities.
The wind in that part of Dallas blows from the south, straight into Joppa, which suggests that southern sources are the dominant contributors to air quality in the neighborhood. The leading contributor among them is city-owned McCommas Bluff Landfill, yet the landfill was not mentioned in the editorial a single time.
Analyses of particulate matter (PM 2.5) shows that the largest contributors in Joppa include the landfill, transportation emissions, construction dust, and regional weather patterns. When developing a credible air quality strategy, southern inputs must be prioritized. In this case, long-standing, tax-paying employers were targeted. At the same time, the likely main contributor to the pollution issue, the city-owned facility that sits directly upwind, was ignored, signaling selective framing.
Adding to the issue is Dallas's financial situation. Much of the city seems to be facing a lack of funds, given the upcoming library closures in September and the public pool due to budget shortfalls. Engaging in a multi-million dollar evaluation and shutdown of businesses that generate tens of millions in revenue and support over 100 jobs is an unideal solution.
The editorial urged an "independent and fair" evaluation of environmental impacts, yet failed to incorporate what supporters describe as overwhelming science and data bout dominant pollution sources.
By omitting the landfill and focusing solely on private industry, the article advanced a narrative that plant closures alone would "fix" Joppa's air pollution issue, a claim unsupported by the data available.
If Dallas remains serious about improving air quality in Joppa, it must confront the primary sources contributing to particulate matter; otherwise, shutting down plants risks becoming political theater rather than meaningful environmental reform.
