Chip Roy Uses His Vote as Leverage in SAVE Act Standoff

Representative Chip Roy (R-TX) isn't just frustrated with the Senate; he's putting his vote where his mouth is.

Roy announced on X that he would vote against a Senate housing package moving to the House floor, and went further, pledging to oppose other bills and procedural rules until Republican leadership takes up a slate of priorities he considers non-negotiable.

Those priorities include the SAVE Act, HR2 border codification, a ban on congressional stock trading, and a reconciliation package that isn't built on accounting maneuvers.

"It's a bad bill, and it's more Senate failure theater on SAVE," Roy wrote. "I will also oppose other bills AND rules until we fight for SAVE, HR2 (border codification), ban on congressional stock trading, & a reconciliation 3 that isn’t a fake pay-for approps bill."

Signed National Pledge

However, Roy is not alone. Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) announced that she and 24 other House members had signed a letter committing to vote against any Senate legislation unless the SAVE Act is passed first.

The group includes a cross-section of conservative House members from more than a dozen states.

"The Senate cannot keep obstructing President Trump's agenda while ignoring election integrity," Luna wrote on X. "I call on my fellow colleagues to stand firm and honor their pledge."

This all comes back to the SAVE Act itself, and a legal controversy surrounding the system it relies on.

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration's overhaul of the SAVE database, which aggregates personal data to check voter eligibility, is unlawful and cannot be used in its current form.

The system, originally designed for individual benefit eligibility checks, was expanded under the Department of Homeland Security and DOGE to allow bulk screening of voter rolls.

U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle Sooknanan found that the overhaul combined sensitive personal data in ways that threatened the privacy rights and voting rights of American citizens, including foreign-born citizens who were incorrectly flagged as potential noncitizens.

For Roy and his allies, the court ruling only sharpens the urgency.