If you have student loans, this week matters. Major changes just took effect, and not everyone thinks they're for the better.
The reforms are part of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law last July, and they touch nearly every corner of student borrowing, from how much students can take out to how they repay it.
For many borrowers, the bottom line is higher monthly payments starting now.
Congressman Greg Casar (D-TX) didn't mince words. "They kicked millions of borrowers off of their SAVE plans, and that means for the average graduate, you could be paying up to $244 more a month because of Donald Trump's actions, all while he also gave billionaires a tax cut in the same bill," he said. "Totally unacceptable."
The SAVE plan, a Biden-era income-based repayment program, has effectively been eliminated.
Borrowers enrolled in it are now being told they must switch to a new plan within 90 days, and under the replacement options, many will pay considerably more each month.
Recent Reports
The changes don't stop there, as CNN reported that graduate students now face strict annual and lifetime borrowing caps, replacing the previous system that allowed them to borrow up to the full cost of their program.
Students pursuing medical or law degrees will be capped at $50,000 a year and $200,000 over their lifetime, a significant reduction for fields where programs routinely cost far more.
In a move that sparked immediate legal challenges, nursing, physician assistant, and physical therapy students were classified outside the professional program category, subjecting them to even lower limits.
A federal judge last week temporarily paused those lower limits while lawsuits work through the courts.
Parents aren't exempt either; the popular Parent PLUS loan, previously capped at the full cost of attendance, will now be limited to $20,000 a year and $65,000 total for parents of new students.
The Department of Education says the reforms simplify repayment and improve the overall health of the lending system. Critics, including Casar, argue they shift the burden onto the borrowers least able to absorb it.
